For the past ten years, I’ve been answering the question,
“I’m sorry, where did you say you
went to college?” to confused friends and colleagues who could have been
forgiven for not having ever heard of my small alma mater, comprised of only
4,000 students in that far-flung, distant city of Seattle. I hadn’t heard of
Seattle Pacific University, either, prior to my somewhat impulsive decision to
apply as a high school junior living in the suburbs of Chicago. How disturbing,
then, to suddenly catch glimpses of my college, my onetime home, awash in
tragedy on the homepages of BBC and the New York Times. To begin to field new
questions: “That was your college?
The one with that shooting?” A school suddenly famous for reasons so unwelcome.
After college, I moved to the other Washington, the other Capitol
Hill, and have made Washington, DC my home for the past 5 years. In this city, the
shootings of poor people and of non-whites usually do not make the front page. In
this city, an organization like Homicide Watch exists to remember murder
victims in Washington, DC and track their cases, because the news does not do a
sufficient job (http://homicidewatch.org).
For the past few days, I have clung fiercely to a sharply
local sense of grief: this was my
school, my community. A sense of
violation and vulnerability sits heavily in my belly. A sour feeling of anguish
has taken root deeply in my skin. I take stock of everything lost: Paul Lee,
killed at 19. Jon Meis, saddled with the mantle of “hero,” who starts his married life under this terrible shadow of trauma. I imagine the awful,
tedious aftermath as the shock starts to fade and conversations circle around
and around the same topics: “were you there?” The uneasy feeling of exclusion
for those who weren’t. The complicated feelings for those of us now distant
from the university, or for those who never much liked SPU. The alienation for those who do not or
cannot or will not process this murder through the framework of Christian
teachings; the difficulty of
navigating your own path through grief in the midst of collective
commemoration.
I have clung fiercely to a sharply local sense of grief, but
I launch wild accusations at myself all the while. Who am I to claim the grief
of this community as my own—me, who graduated SPU six years ago and have no
direct ties to any of the students involved in the attack? More cuttingly: who
I am to hold this grief so dear to my heart, this killing of one, when 11,419
people in the United States were killed by guns last year? When 84 people were
shot and killed in my own city of Washington, DC last year? (http://guns.periscopic.com/?year=2013
http://homicidewatch.org/2013/12/27/homicide-in-2013-by-the-numbers/)
After the Sandy Hook massacre in January, 2013, my father
wrote an essay about the shooting. My father was once a pastor and is now the
President of the Evangelical Covenant Church—a protestant denomination
headquartered in Chicago, with churches throughout the United States and
Canada, and with a presence in other parts of the world. In his essay, which
I’ve included below, he reminds me that grief is always local: it runs through the veins of the human connections
we have forged to the specific places and people we have known. We grieve
because we have first known and loved, and now lost. The grief is ours. We claim
it as our own. This was my school; I can cry for its loss.
But what I had failed to grasp was that all grief is local. The paradox is that this intensely local feeling connects us to so many more who are far removed from our individual occasion of mourning. All
11,419 gun deaths in the United States last year were experienced intensely,
intimately, horribly, by those who were connected to those victims. This is
trite to say, of course, but it is the peaceful resting place my wild mind can
come to when I lose myself rehearsing the sorrows of this week. All grief is
personal. All grief is shared. In our own individual experiences of sadness, I
claim a new privilege: compassion. Compassion, which means “to suffer with.” We
unwillingly join the multitudinous ranks of those who have been torn through
with senseless loss from gun violence. We join them unwillingly, furious,
doubled-over in anguish. But we join them with a new, wide-eyed knowledge and
compassion: now we know, too. I’m sorry
for your loss. I’m sorry for mine. Let’s walk this road together.
“Rachel’s Weeping”
By Gary Walter
Covenant Companion
(February 2013)
I find myself still sighing deeply over the massacre of
innocents at Sandy Hook School, Newtown, Connecticut.
Societally, we’ve gone through a collective emotional
concussion, disorienting and nauseating, which are the two symptoms I remember
from my concussion as a kid getting beaned on the cheek by a Little League
fastball.
I actually hope we
don’t recover quickly. I hope we remain
disoriented and nauseated for a good while longer, because regaining
equilibrium too quickly will only serve the status quo. The pattern is
familiar. The public clamors for well-meaning discussions around gun violence,
but as the horror fades, life and other issues inevitably crowd in. We may not mean to, but we move on. The discussion is then ceded to those holding
unyielding abstractions, talking past each other citing competing studies and
shibboleths.
Intractability sets in. Nothing changes. And the litany of our young dying too young
in mass shootings builds: Columbine, Virginia Tech, Northern Illinois
University, Sandy Hook.
After the birth of Jesus, Herod ordered the slaughter of all
boys under the age of two in the region of Bethlehem in a flailing attempt to
eliminate this newborn threat for the title King of the Jews. Jesus was the intended target of a massacre
of children. Matthew 2:17 quotes the prophet Jeremiah to capture the region’s
grief:
“A voice is heard in Ramah, weeping and great mourning,
Rachel weeping for her children and refusing to be comforted, because they are
no more.”
In my own concussive cobwebs I hear Rachel’s mourning from
two directions within our Covenant family.
First there is mourning from Newtown and every place like
Newtown. While we have no Covenant churches precisely there, the state of
Connecticut is small with plenty of Covenant connections to the community. It
is where Pastor Doug Bixby grew up. He wrote me, ”It is simply one of the
darkest days in the history of this town”.
Six year old victim Ana Marquez-Greene is the daughter of a high school
friend to another Covenant pastor, Matt Lundgren. Covenanters Jack and Becca
Dowling were on site as rapid response chaplains, counseling families and
first-responders. Similar stories multiply.
The grief is palpable to many others because we have
churches in many other communities like Newtown. The faces, names and personal stories
of the children and staff could be transposed directly to the neighborhood
school of a goodly number of Covenanters in any number of states and provinces.
The victims are recognizable, even
though not known. Newtown becomes Mytown.
With this commonality, the sentiment “It could never happen here,”
sorrowfully concedes, “Well, maybe it could.”
But interestingly, that very grieving is helping more and
more people hear the mournful strains of Rachel coming from a second direction.
The loss of children and youth to gun violence is an ever-present pain for many
urban Covenant churches and ethnic communities, from crowded New York City to
sparsely populated Alaskan villages on the Bering Sea. Pain shared is life shared. The pain of Sandy Hook is awakening people to
the truth that many in our urban communities and ethnic populations live with
this anguish continually.
In the aftermath of Newtown, I sent an email to a sampling
of churches who are determined to bring the hope of Christ to high-risk areas.
I asked if any children and youth from the congregation had ever been wounded
or killed in gun violence. Here is just a fraction of the responses. These are not statistics. These are
Covenanters. These are your children and youth.
·
Gregory, pastor’s great grandson, age 14, killed
by a stray bullet on way home from a basketball game.
·
Bolivia, age 20, murdered in front of 11 adolescents
on sidewalk of the church.
Tamika, age four, shot in the head by gang crossfire. Survived but will be mentally disabled for life.
Tamika, age four, shot in the head by gang crossfire. Survived but will be mentally disabled for life.
·
T.J., killed randomly while riding home on a
bus.
·
John, 17, murdered just before a scheduled
meeting with the pastor to turn his life around.
·
Marvin, pastor’s son, killed on the sidewalk.
I can’t tell you how proud I am of congregations like these
that run to the need, not from it. These
sisters and brothers are uncommonly courageous, wise, caring, persistent, and
prophetic.
The pain of Rachel knows no geographic, socio-economic or
ethnic boundaries. There is common ground at the cross….and there is common
ground at the grave of our children.
This one time can common ground lead to common sense in balancing rights
with responsibilities? Indeed, don’t all rights come with responsibilities? We
all learned the right to free speech ends at yelling “fire” in a crowded
theater. My church’s right to the free exercise of religion still came with a
$250,000 price tag for mandated fire sprinklers and other building code
requirements. Now is the time to find
common sense approaches for the common good in curbing gun violence, if only
for our children. And the Rachels who mourn.
No comments:
Post a Comment